You are here

Reconstruction of ancestral chromosome architecture and gene repertoire reveals principles of genome evolution in a model yeast genus.

TitleReconstruction of ancestral chromosome architecture and gene repertoire reveals principles of genome evolution in a model yeast genus.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuthorsVakirilis, N, Sarilar, V, Drillon, G, Fleiss, A, Agier, N, Meyniel, J-P, Blanpain, L, Carbone, A*, Devillers, H, Dubois, K, Gillet-Markowska, A, Graziani, S, Huu-Vang, N, Poirel, M, Reisser, C, Schott, J, Schacherer, J, Lafontaine, I, Llorente, B, Neuvéglise, C, Fischer, G
JournalGenome Res
Date Published2016 May 31

Reconstructing genome history is complex but necessary to reveal quantitative principles governing genome evolution. Such reconstruction requires recapitulating into a single evolutionary framework the evolution of genome architecture and gene repertoire. Here, we reconstructed the genome history of the genus Lachancea that appeared to cover a continuous evolutionary range from closely related to more diverged yeast species. Our approach integrated the generation of a high-quality genome data set; the development of AnChro, a new algorithm for reconstructing ancestral genome architecture; and a comprehensive analysis of gene repertoire evolution. We found that the ancestral genome of the genus Lachancea contained eight chromosomes and about 5173 protein-coding genes. Moreover, we characterized 24 horizontal gene transfers and 159 putative gene creation events that punctuated species diversification. We retraced all chromosomal rearrangements, including gene losses, gene duplications, chromosomal inversions and translocations at single gene resolution. Gene duplications outnumbered losses and balanced rearrangements with 1503, 929, and 423 events, respectively. Gene content variations between extant species are mainly driven by differential gene losses, while gene duplications remained globally constant in all lineages. Remarkably, we discovered that balanced chromosomal rearrangements could be responsible for up to 14% of all gene losses by disrupting genes at their breakpoints. Finally, we found that nonsynonymous substitutions reached fixation at a coordinated pace with chromosomal inversions, translocations, and duplications, but not deletions. Overall, we provide a granular view of genome evolution within an entire eukaryotic genus, linking gene content, chromosome rearrangements, and protein divergence into a single evolutionary framework.

Alternate JournalGenome Res.
PubMed ID27247244

Open Positions